Truth Blocks Analysis

Back to Post
New Scoring System: This post's overall score is calculated from the individual truth blocks below. To provide feedback or discuss specific arguments, comment on individual truth blocks rather than the post as a whole.
Organic food is healthier because it's natural. St...
by losted • December 02, 2025
Original Post
Organic food is healthier because it's natural. St...
Organic food is healthier because it's natural. Studies show organic produce has fewer pesticide residues. The organic industry has grown 300% since 2000, proving consumers understand its benefits. However, a 2012 Stanford meta-analysis found no strong evidence that organic foods are more nutritious than conventional ones. Big Agriculture lobbies spend millions to suppress this kind of research, which is why mainstream media rarely reports it.
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
By losted on December 02, 2025

Analysis Summary

5
Truth Blocks
34.2
Avg Logic Quality
Avg User Score
0.0
Avg Evidence Score
Avg Total Score
0.57
Legacy Truth Score
0.88
Legacy Confidence
0.56
Legacy Weighted

Individual Truth Blocks

Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 0.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.90
⚠️ Appeal_To_Nature fallacy
Organic food is healthier because it's natural.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Organic food is healthier because it's natural." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.25
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Appeal_To_Nature
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 02, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 87.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.90 Confidence: 0.90
Studies show organic produce has fewer pesticide residues.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Studies show organic produce has fewer pesticide residues." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.85
Truth: 0.90
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 02, 2025
Block 3
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 0.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
🐑 Bandwagon fallacy ⚠️ Non_Sequiturs fallacy
The organic industry has grown 300% since 2000, proving consumers understand its benefits.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"The organic industry has grown 300% since 2000, proving consumers understand its benefits." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.35
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Bandwagon Non_Sequiturs
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 02, 2025
Block 4
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 82.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.90
However, a 2012 Stanford meta-analysis found no strong evidence that organic foods are more nutritious than conventional ones.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"However, a 2012 Stanford meta-analysis found no strong evidence that organic foods are more nutritious than conventional ones." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.80
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 02, 2025
Block 5
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 2.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
⚠️ Conspiracy_Thinking fallacy
Big Agriculture lobbies spend millions to suppress this kind of research, which is why mainstream media rarely reports it.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Big Agriculture lobbies spend millions to suppress this kind of research, which is why mainstream media rarely reports it." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.25
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Conspiracy_Thinking
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 02, 2025
About Truth Blocks

Truth blocks are minimal argument units that represent atomic reasoning. Each block is analyzed independently for:

  • Truth Score: Factual accuracy (0-1)
  • Reasoning Types: Deductive, inductive, etc.
  • Logical Fallacies: Detected reasoning errors
  • Confidence: AI certainty in analysis

The weighted score combines truth score with reasoning quality and fallacy penalties according to our scoring criteria.

Quick Actions
View Original JSON API All Analyses