Truth Blocks Analysis

Back to Post
New Scoring System: This post's overall score is calculated from the individual truth blocks below. To provide feedback or discuss specific arguments, comment on individual truth blocks rather than the post as a whole.
I have high levels of forever chemicals in my blood - what can I do about it?
by BBC • December 03, 2025
Original Post
I have high levels of forever chemicals in my blood - what can I do about it?
I have high levels of forever chemicals in my blood - what can I do about it? 2 days ago Share Save Catrin Nye BBC Panorama Share Save "That is so much higher than I expected" - watch the moment Catrin Nye is told about her forever chemical levels As I walked into the medical clinic for my blood test, all I could think about was how to avoid looking like a wimp on camera. I didn't really contemplate what the test would reveal. I am not great with needles - but as part of a BBC Panorama investigation into so-called forever chemicals, I was being tested to see what level of them I had in my blood. As a mum with two small children, I also wanted to know whether they may be having an impact on my family. Forever chemicals, or PFAS (per-and poly fluoroalkyl substances), are a group of about 10,000 chemicals. They have been used for decades, in anything from waterproof clothes, to cookware, electronics and medical equipment. They are persistent pollutants, meaning they don't degrade easily and instead build up in the environment. They exist in our homes, our water and in our food. Scientists have linked a small number of them to serious harms, such as infertility and cancer. Any level of PFAS above 2ng (nanograms) per millilitre of blood is considered to bring health risks, according to Dr Sabine Donnai, a specialist in preventative healthcare. She has never met anyone without at least some PFAS in their bloodstream. Dr Donnai delivered the news very gently - but it still hit me hard. The forever chemicals in my blood would "most likely" have an impact on my health, she told me. I also learned that, sadly, my body would have rid itself of some of these chemicals during pregnancy, by passing it on to my babies. That was the moment this investigation stopped being just work and felt very personal. "They [PFAS levels] would have been even higher before your pregnancies," Dr Donnai told me. "You will have passed on to your children for sure. " I was worried, but I also felt angry about how this could have happened without me having any knowledge, and very little control. I wanted to know more about these substances and the health issues they have been linked to. PFAS chemicals "don't break down", said Stephanie Metzger from the Royal Society of Chemistry. "Once they get into our bodies, they stick around and build up little-by-little until they start to interfere with our systems. "Some PFAS have been linked to thyroid problems, some to kidney and liver cancer, and some have been shown to affect fertility. " Stephanie Metzger: PFAS chemicals "don't break down" As for me, it is "unlikely" I will be able to bring my levels to zero, said Dr Donnai. "But you can reduce it over the next two or three years with a strategy. " She suggested I increase my fibre intake - either by eating more oats, barley, beans, nuts and seeds, or by taking supplements of gel-forming fibre. Increased fibre in our diet is "the strongest evidence to date that might help", she said. If I did these things, menstruation would also help reduce my current PFAS levels over time, she added. She also told me to identify the biggest sources of exposure in my home - replace my non-stick cookware with ceramic, stainless steel or cast iron alternatives, use a water filter and switch to eco-friendly cleaning products which are transparent about being PFAS-free. Look for PFAS-free make-up and hair products and avoid ingredients with "fluoro" or "PTFE" in the name, she added. Similar advice was given to mum-to-be Pam Kavanagh, who we visited at home in Berkshire with Dr Federica Amati of Imperial College London. Pam was eager to know how to reduce the possible household risks of PFAS to her baby - and Dr Amati has studied how babies and children can be affected by forever chemicals. "When we drink tap water, we are, depending on where you live, at varying levels of exposure to PFAS," Dr Amati said. Just buying a water filter can help to reduce exposure, she said - whether that is a jug with a filter in it, or a filter installed into the actual sink. Any non-stick frying pans with scratches on them should be thrown out, Dr Amati advised. Stainless steel or ceramic pans "are far safer", she said. Carpets can be treated with PFAS to make them more stain resistant, she added, suggesting that people vacuum their carpets every day. "Making sure you ventilate the room by opening the windows every single day is a good idea [because] it really collects as house dust," she added Dr Federica Amati advises mum-to-be Pam Kavanagh about the possible risks posed by PFAS chemicals in the home Dr Amati then turned to children's clothing. Pam was left "speechless" to discover that waterproof or stain-resistant clothing can contain PFAS. Manufacturers are under no obligation to disclose this information. Some children's products are not PFAS-free, despite claiming to be, the BBC learned. We found PFAS in a children's coat we bought from the Mountain Warehouse website a few months ago, even though the site says that none of its children's products are made with forever chemicals. The jacket we tested came from a small batch of old stock, made more than three years ago, Mountain Warehouse told the BBC. Although the coat "meets UK safety standards", it added, the product has now been withdrawn from sale. The company said it was working "to eliminate PFAS from all products as soon as possible" and that "children's clothing manufactured since 2023 is PFAS-free". If fabrics containing PFAS come into "prolonged contact with human skin" there's the potential the chemicals can be absorbed across the skin, explained Prof Stuart Harrad at the University of Birmingham, who tested the coat for us. To reduce the risk, opt for untreated fabrics and avoid "waterproof" or "stain-repellent" labels unless they have a PFAS-free certification, said Dr Donnai. Our greatest exposure to forever chemicals comes from food - particularly fish, meat, eggs, fruit and fruit products, according to the European Food Safety Authority. An innocent-looking strawberry could have PFAS exposure, I learned, because the chemicals can be added to pesticides "to help them stick better to the fruit, so when it rains it doesn't wash off", explained Prof David Megson of Manchester Metropolitan University. Of the assortment of picnic items we laid out, a bottle of wine could carry the greatest PFAS risk, Prof Megson told me. "We concentrate hundreds of grapes into each bottle. As the wider pesticide breaks down, the PFAS bit is left behind," he said. Fruits such as grapes may have been exposed to PFAS chemicals PFAS chemicals are so embedded in modern life that none of us can fully escape them. They have made our lives convenient and our products durable - but at a potential cost we are only now beginning to count. The European Commission is consulting on an outright ban on about 10,000 PFAS chemicals. The UK government says it is looking to ban or restrict some chemicals but has not committed to a blanket ban. It told us that it is "working at pace with regulators to assess levels of PFAS in the environment, their sources and potential risks" to inform its approach to "policy and regulation". PFAS chemicals have many essential uses, and safer substitutes are not yet available, argues the Chemical Industries Association. It says "regulators and industry need to work together in setting transition periods" to bring alternatives to market. When I first had the blood tests, I thought it would provide an interesting scene for our documentary. But once you know these chemicals are inside you, you can't unknow it. Having a plan to reduce my exposure is a small comfort. But I'll be honest, it is also another thing to worry about
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
By BBC on December 03, 2025

Analysis Summary

19
Truth Blocks
36.4
Avg Logic Quality
Avg User Score
0.0
Avg Evidence Score
Avg Total Score
0.45
Legacy Truth Score
0.86
Legacy Confidence
0.41
Legacy Weighted

Individual Truth Blocks

Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 25.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
I have high levels of forever chemicals in my blood - what can I do about it?
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"I have high levels of forever chemicals in my blood - what can I do about it?" Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 25.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
Catrin Nye BBC Panorama "That is so much higher than I expected" - watch the moment Catrin Nye is told about her forever chemical levels As I walked into the medical clinic for my blood test, all I could think about was how to avoid looking a wimp on camera.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Catrin Nye BBC Panorama "That is so much higher than I expected" - watch the moment Catrin Nye is told about her forever chemical levels As I walked into the medical clinic for my blood test, all I could think about was how to avoid looking a wimp on camera." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 3
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 10.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.10 Confidence: 0.90
I didn't really contemplate what the test would reveal.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"I didn't really contemplate what the test would reveal." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.10
Truth: 0.10
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 4
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 64.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.70 Confidence: 0.80
I am not great with needles - but as part of a BBC Panorama investigation into so-called forever chemicals, I was being tested to see what level of them I had in my blood.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"I am not great with needles - but as part of a BBC Panorama investigation into so-called forever chemicals, I was being tested to see what level of them I had in my blood." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.60
Truth: 0.70
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Moderate
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 5
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 25.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
As a mum with two small children, I also wanted to know whether they may be having an impact on my family.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"As a mum with two small children, I also wanted to know whether they may be having an impact on my family." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 6
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 82.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.90
Forever chemicals, or PFAS (per-and poly fluoroalkyl substances), are a group of about 10,000 chemicals.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Forever chemicals, or PFAS (per-and poly fluoroalkyl substances), are a group of about 10,000 chemicals." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.80
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 7
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 45.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
They have been used for decades, in anything from waterproof clothes, to cookware, electronics and medical equipment.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"They have been used for decades, in anything from waterproof clothes, to cookware, electronics and medical equipment." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 8
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 82.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.90
They are persistent pollutants, meaning they don't degrade easily and instead build up in the environment.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"They are persistent pollutants, meaning they don't degrade easily and instead build up in the environment." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.80
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 9
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 25.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
They exist in our homes, our water and in our food.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"They exist in our homes, our water and in our food." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 10
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 4.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
⚠️ False_Premise fallacy
Scientists have linked a small number of them to serious harms, such as infertility and cancer.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Scientists have linked a small number of them to serious harms, such as infertility and cancer." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
False_Premise
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 11
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 82.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.90
Any level of PFAS above 2ng (nanograms) per millilitre of blood is considered to bring health risks, according to Dr Sabine Donnai, a specialist in preventative healthcare.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Any level of PFAS above 2ng (nanograms) per millilitre of blood is considered to bring health risks, according to Dr Sabine Donnai, a specialist in preventative healthcare." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.80
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 12
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 30.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
🏃 Hasty_Generalization fallacy
She has never met anyone without at least some PFAS in their bloodstream.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"She has never met anyone without at least some PFAS in their bloodstream." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Hasty_Generalization
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 13
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 25.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
Dr Donnai delivered the news very gently - but it still hit me hard.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Dr Donnai delivered the news very gently - but it still hit me hard." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 14
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 64.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.70 Confidence: 0.85
The forever chemicals in my blood would "most likely" have an impact on my health, she told me.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"The forever chemicals in my blood would "most likely" have an impact on my health, she told me." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.60
Truth: 0.70
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Moderate
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 15
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 45.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
I also learned that, sadly, my body would have rid itself of some of these chemicals during pregnancy, by passing it on to my babies.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"I also learned that, sadly, my body would have rid itself of some of these chemicals during pregnancy, by passing it on to my babies." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 16
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 15.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.10 Confidence: 0.85
That was the moment this investigation stopped being just work and felt very personal.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"That was the moment this investigation stopped being just work and felt very personal." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.10
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 17
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 4.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
⚠️ False_Premise fallacy
"They [PFAS levels] would have been even higher before your pregnancies," Dr Donnai told me.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
""They [PFAS levels] would have been even higher before your pregnancies," Dr Donnai told me." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
False_Premise
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 18
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 15.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.10 Confidence: 0.85
"You will have passed on to your children for sure.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
""You will have passed on to your children for sure. "" Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.10
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
Block 19
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 25.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
" I was worried, but I also felt angry about how this could have happened without me having any knowledge, and very little control.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"I was worried, but I also felt angry about how this could have happened without me having any knowledge, and very little control." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 03, 2025
About Truth Blocks

Truth blocks are minimal argument units that represent atomic reasoning. Each block is analyzed independently for:

  • Truth Score: Factual accuracy (0-1)
  • Reasoning Types: Deductive, inductive, etc.
  • Logical Fallacies: Detected reasoning errors
  • Confidence: AI certainty in analysis

The weighted score combines truth score with reasoning quality and fallacy penalties according to our scoring criteria.