Truth Blocks Analysis

Back to Post
New Scoring System: This post's overall score is calculated from the individual truth blocks below. To provide feedback or discuss specific arguments, comment on individual truth blocks rather than the post as a whole.
First kiss dates back 21 million years, say scientists
by BBC • December 04, 2025
Original Post
First kiss dates back 21 million years, say scientists
First kiss dates back 21 million years, say scientists 19 November 2025 Share Save Victoria Gill Science correspondent, BBC News Share Save Getty The researchers found evidence of kissing in multiple species Humans do it, monkeys do it, even polar bears do it. And now researchers have reconstructed the evolutionary origins of kissing. Their study suggests that the mouth-on-mouth kiss evolved more than 21 million years ago, and was something that the common ancestor of humans and other great apes probably indulged in. The same research concluded that Neanderthals may have kissed too – and that humans and Neanderthals may even have smooched one another. The scientists studied kissing because it presents something of an evolutionary puzzle - it has no obvious survival or reproductive benefits, and yet it is something that is seen not just in many human societies, but across the animal kingdom. Getty The scientists defined a kiss as mouth-on-mouth contact "with some movement of lips or mouthparts and no food transfer" By finding evidence of other animals engaging in kissing, scientists were able to construct an "evolutionary family tree" to work out when it was most likely to have evolved. To ensure that they were comparing the same behaviour across different species, the researchers had to give a very precise - rather unromantic - definition to a "kiss". In their study, published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour, they defined kissing as non aggressive, directed oral-oral contact "with some movement of lips or mouthparts and no food transfer". "Humans, chimps, and bonobos all kiss," explained lead researcher Dr Matilda Brindle, an evolutionary biologist from the University of Oxford. From that, she concluded, "it's likely that their most recent common ancestor kissed. " "We think kissing probably evolved around 21. 5 million years ago in the large apes. " Getty Images In this study, scientists found behaviour that matched their scientific definition of kissing in wolves, prairie dogs, polar bears (very sloppy - lots of tongue), and even albatrosses. They focused on primates - and apes in particular - in order to build an evolutionary picture of the origin of the human kiss. The same study also concluded that Neanderthals - our closest ancient human relatives that died out around 40,000 years ago - also kissed. One previous piece of research on Neanderthal DNA also showed that modern humans and Neanderthals shared an oral microbe - a type of bacteria found in our saliva. "That means that they must have been swapping saliva for hundreds of thousands of years after the two species split," explained Dr Brindle. Getty The scientists say this behaviour is something 'we share with our non-human relatives' While this study pinpointed when kissing evolved it was not able to answer the question of why. There are already a number of theories - that it arose from grooming behaviour in our ape ancestors or that it might provide an intimate way to assess the health and even the compatibility of a partner. Dr Brindle hopes that this will open a door to answering that question. "It's important for us to understand that this is something we share with our non-human relatives," she said. "We should be studying this behaviour, not just dismissing it as silly because it has romantic connotations in humans
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
By BBC on December 04, 2025

Analysis Summary

16
Truth Blocks
61.6
Avg Logic Quality
Avg User Score
0.0
Avg Evidence Score
Avg Total Score
0.67
Legacy Truth Score
0.84
Legacy Confidence
0.67
Legacy Weighted

Individual Truth Blocks

Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 64.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.70 Confidence: 0.85
First kiss dates back 21 million years, say scientists 19 November 2025 Victoria Gill Science correspondent, BBC News Getty The researchers found evidence of kissing in multiple species Humans do it, monkeys do it, even polar bears do it.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"First kiss dates back 21 million years, say scientists 19 November 2025 Victoria Gill Science correspondent, BBC News Getty The researchers found evidence of kissing in multiple species Humans do it, monkeys do it, even polar bears do it." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.60
Truth: 0.70
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Moderate
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 64.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.70 Confidence: 0.80
And now researchers have reconstructed the evolutionary origins of kissing.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"And now researchers have reconstructed the evolutionary origins of kissing." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.60
Truth: 0.70
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Moderate
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 3
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 67.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.70 Confidence: 0.75
Their study suggests that the mouth-on-mouth kiss evolved more than 21 million years ago, and was something that the common ancestor of humans and other great apes probably indulged in.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Their study suggests that the mouth-on-mouth kiss evolved more than 21 million years ago, and was something that the common ancestor of humans and other great apes probably indulged in." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.65
Truth: 0.70
Confidence: 0.75
Logic Quality: Moderate
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 4
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 45.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.40 Confidence: 0.60
The same research concluded that Neanderthals may have kissed too – and that humans and Neanderthals may even have smooched one another.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"The same research concluded that Neanderthals may have kissed too – and that humans and Neanderthals may even have smooched one another." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.50
Truth: 0.40
Confidence: 0.60
Logic Quality: Moderate
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 5
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 82.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.90
The scientists studied kissing because it presents something of an evolutionary puzzle - it has no obvious survival or reproductive benefits, and yet it is something that is seen not just in many human societies, but across the animal kingdom.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"The scientists studied kissing because it presents something of an evolutionary puzzle - it has no obvious survival or reproductive benefits, and yet it is something that is seen not just in many human societies, but across the animal kingdom." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.80
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 6
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 77.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.80 Confidence: 0.85
Getty The scientists defined a kiss as mouth-on-mouth contact "with some movement of lips or mouthparts and no food transfer" By finding evidence of other animals engaging in kissing, scientists were able to construct an "evolutionary family tree" to work out when it was most likely to have evolved.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Getty The scientists defined a kiss as mouth-on-mouth contact "with some movement of lips or mouthparts and no food transfer" By finding evidence of other animals engaging in kissing, scientists were able to construct an "evolutionary family tree" to work out when it was most likely to have evolved." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.80
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 7
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 77.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.80 Confidence: 0.85
To ensure that they were comparing the same behaviour across different species, the researchers had to give a very precise - rather unromantic - definition to a "kiss".
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"To ensure that they were comparing the same behaviour across different species, the researchers had to give a very precise - rather unromantic - definition to a "kiss"." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.80
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 8
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 87.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.90 Confidence: 0.90
In their study, published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour, they defined kissing as non aggressive, directed oral-oral contact "with some movement of lips or mouthparts and no food transfer".
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"In their study, published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour, they defined kissing as non aggressive, directed oral-oral contact "with some movement of lips or mouthparts and no food transfer"." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.85
Truth: 0.90
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 9
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 82.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.90
"Humans, chimps, and bonobos all kiss," explained lead researcher Dr Matilda Brindle, an evolutionary biologist from the University of Oxford.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
""Humans, chimps, and bonobos all kiss," explained lead researcher Dr Matilda Brindle, an evolutionary biologist from the University of Oxford." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.80
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 10
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 45.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
From that, she concluded, "it's likely that their most recent common ancestor kissed.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"From that, she concluded, "it's likely that their most recent common ancestor kissed. "" Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 11
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 45.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
" "We think kissing probably evolved around 21.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
""We think kissing probably evolved around 21." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 12
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 10.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.10 Confidence: 0.85
5 million years ago in the large apes.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"5 million years ago in the large apes. "" Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.10
Truth: 0.10
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 13
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 77.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.80 Confidence: 0.85
" In this study, scientists found behaviour that matched their scientific definition of kissing in wolves, prairie dogs, polar bears (very sloppy - lots of tongue), and even albatrosses.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"In this study, scientists found behaviour that matched their scientific definition of kissing in wolves, prairie dogs, polar bears (very sloppy - lots of tongue), and even albatrosses." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.80
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 14
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 77.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.80 Confidence: 0.85
They focused on primates - and apes in particular - in order to build an evolutionary picture of the origin of the human kiss.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"They focused on primates - and apes in particular - in order to build an evolutionary picture of the origin of the human kiss." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.80
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 15
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 4.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
⚠️ False_Premise fallacy
The same study also concluded that Neanderthals - our closest ancient human relatives that died out around 40, - also kissed.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"The same study also concluded that Neanderthals - our closest ancient human relatives that died out around 40, - also kissed." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
False_Premise
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
Block 16
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 82.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.90
One previous piece of research on Neanderthal DNA also showed that modern humans and Neanderthals shared an oral microbe - a type of bacteria found in our saliva.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"One previous piece of research on Neanderthal DNA also showed that modern humans and Neanderthals shared an oral microbe - a type of bacteria found in our saliva." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.80
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.90
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 04, 2025
About Truth Blocks

Truth blocks are minimal argument units that represent atomic reasoning. Each block is analyzed independently for:

  • Truth Score: Factual accuracy (0-1)
  • Reasoning Types: Deductive, inductive, etc.
  • Logical Fallacies: Detected reasoning errors
  • Confidence: AI certainty in analysis

The weighted score combines truth score with reasoning quality and fallacy penalties according to our scoring criteria.