Truth Blocks Analysis

Back to Post
New Scoring System: This post's overall score is calculated from the individual truth blocks below. To provide feedback or discuss specific arguments, comment on individual truth blocks rather than the post as a whole.
Natalie Tippett & Lily
by TodayThinkTrap • December 16, 2025
Original Post
Natalie Tippett & Lily
After Natalie Tippett broke her silence, several statements and reactions emerged:
1. “Now that she’s finally spoken, everything makes sense.”
2. “If she stayed silent for this long, there must have been something to hide.”
3. “Her version proves that Lily’s narrative was exaggerated.”
4. “People wouldn’t react this strongly unless something really wrong happened.”
5. “You can tell who’s telling the truth just by how emotional they sound.”
6. “The timing of her statement says more than the words themselves.”
🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy? Which thinking traps do you spot here?
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
By TodayThinkTrap on December 16, 2025

Analysis Summary

8
Truth Blocks
10.9
Avg Logic Quality
Avg User Score
0.0
Avg Evidence Score
Avg Total Score
0.31
Legacy Truth Score
0.84
Legacy Confidence
0.20
Legacy Weighted

Individual Truth Blocks

Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 10.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.10 Confidence: 0.85
After Natalie Tippett broke her silence, several statements and reactions emerged: 1.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"After Natalie Tippett broke her silence, several statements and reactions emerged: 1." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.10
Truth: 0.10
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 15.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.10 Confidence: 0.85
“Now that she’s finally spoken, everything makes sense.” 2.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"“Now that she’s finally spoken, everything makes sense.” 2." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.10
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Block 3
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 4.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
⚠️ Non_Sequitir fallacy
“If she stayed silent for this long, there must have been something to hide.” 3.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"“If she stayed silent for this long, there must have been something to hide.” 3." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Non_Sequitir
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Block 4
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 4.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.80
⚠️ False_Premise fallacy
“Her version proves that Lily’s narrative was exaggerated.” 4.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"“Her version proves that Lily’s narrative was exaggerated.” 4." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
False_Premise
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Block 5
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 25.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
📅 Post_Hoc fallacy
“People wouldn’t react this strongly unless something really wrong happened.” 5.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"“People wouldn’t react this strongly unless something really wrong happened.” 5." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Post_Hoc
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Block 6
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 10.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.20 Confidence: 0.85
😭 Appeal_To_Emotion fallacy
“You can tell who’s telling the truth just by how emotional they sound.” 6.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"“You can tell who’s telling the truth just by how emotional they sound.” 6." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.30
Truth: 0.20
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Appeal_To_Emotion
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Block 7
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 4.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.50 Confidence: 0.85
⚠️ Non_Sequitur fallacy
“The timing of her statement says more than the words themselves.” 🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy?
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"“The timing of her statement says more than the words themselves.” 🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy?" Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.40
Truth: 0.50
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
Detected Fallacies:
Non_Sequitur
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Block 8
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 15.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.10 Confidence: 0.85
Which thinking traps do you spot here?
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Which thinking traps do you spot here?" Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.20
Truth: 0.10
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Weak
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

References canonical block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Dec 16, 2025
About Truth Blocks

Truth blocks are minimal argument units that represent atomic reasoning. Each block is analyzed independently for:

  • Truth Score: Factual accuracy (0-1)
  • Reasoning Types: Deductive, inductive, etc.
  • Logical Fallacies: Detected reasoning errors
  • Confidence: AI certainty in analysis

The weighted score combines truth score with reasoning quality and fallacy penalties according to our scoring criteria.

Quick Actions
View Original JSON API All Analyses