Truth Blocks Analysis

Back to Post
New Scoring System: This post's overall score is calculated from the individual truth blocks below. To provide feedback or discuss specific arguments, comment on individual truth blocks rather than the post as a whole.
The Scientific Evidence for Climate Change: What the Data Really Shows
by Research Rachel • August 01, 2025
Analyzing...

Analyzing content into truth blocks...

Original Post
The Scientific Evidence for Climate Change: What the Data Really Shows


I've spent the last decade researching climate science, and I need to share what the data actually shows. The evidence for human-caused climate change is overwhelming and comes from multiple independent sources.

**Temperature Records**: NASA, NOAA, and other agencies have documented a clear warming trend. The last decade was the warmest on record, with 2023 being the hottest year ever recorded. This isn't just a few hot days - it's a consistent, long-term pattern.

**CO2 Levels**: Atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 parts per million in pre-industrial times to over 420 ppm today. This is a 50% increase, and we know from basic physics that CO2 traps heat in the atmosphere.

**Scientific Consensus**: 97% of climate scientists agree that human activities are the primary driver of recent climate change. This isn't a political statement - it's based on peer-reviewed research published in scientific journals.

**Extreme Weather**: We're seeing more frequent and intense heat waves, hurricanes, and other extreme weather events. The science shows these are linked to climate change.

**Ocean Acidification**: The oceans are becoming more acidic as they absorb CO2, threatening marine ecosystems.

The data is clear: climate change is real, it's caused by human activities, and it's already affecting our planet. We need to take action now to reduce emissions and adapt to the changes that are already happening.

Sources: NASA Climate Change, NOAA Climate.gov, IPCC reports, peer-reviewed scientific literature.

By Research Rachel on August 01, 2025

Analysis Summary

6
Truth Blocks
80.7
Avg Logic Quality
21.0
Avg User Score
50.0
Avg Evidence Score
Avg Total Score
0.83
Legacy Truth Score
0.83
Legacy Confidence
0.96
Legacy Weighted

Individual Truth Blocks

Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 77.0 Evidence: 53.0
Community User: 23.0
Truth: 0.80 Confidence: 0.85
The evidence for human-caused climate change is overwhelming and comes from multiple independent sources.
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.80
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 01, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 85.0 Evidence: 50.0
Community User: 21.0
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.85
The last decade was the warmest on record, with 2023 being the hottest year ever recorded.
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.85
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 01, 2025
Block 3
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 80.0 Evidence: 51.0
Community User: 21.0
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.80
Atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 parts per million in pre-industrial times to over 420 ppm today.
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 01, 2025
Block 4
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 87.0 Evidence: 53.0
Community User: 16.0
Truth: 0.90 Confidence: 0.85
97% of climate scientists agree that human activities are the primary driver of recent climate change.
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.85
Truth: 0.90
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.13
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.11)
Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 01, 2025
Block 5
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 75.0 Evidence: 44.0
Community User: 24.0
Truth: 0.75 Confidence: 0.80
We're seeing more frequent and intense heat waves, hurricanes, and other extreme weather events.
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.75
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 01, 2025
Block 6
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 80.0 Evidence: 49.0
Community User: 21.0
Truth: 0.85 Confidence: 0.85
The oceans are becoming more acidic as they absorb CO2, threatening marine ecosystems.
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.85
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 01, 2025
About Truth Blocks

Truth blocks are minimal argument units that represent atomic reasoning. Each block is analyzed independently for:

  • Truth Score: Factual accuracy (0-1)
  • Reasoning Types: Deductive, inductive, etc.
  • Logical Fallacies: Detected reasoning errors
  • Confidence: AI certainty in analysis

The weighted score combines truth score with reasoning quality and fallacy penalties according to our scoring criteria.