Truth Blocks Analysis

Back to Post
New Scoring System: This post's overall score is calculated from the individual truth blocks below. To provide feedback or discuss specific arguments, comment on individual truth blocks rather than the post as a whole.
Manual Post - by John Thompson
by John Thompson • August 17, 2025
Original Post
Manual Post - by John Thompson
Everyone’s going crazy over wind and solar, but what they don’t tell you is how often those things fail. I read about a blackout in Texas and someone said it was because wind turbines froze. So obviously renewables are unreliable and we can’t depend on them. We’ve had fossil fuels for over a century — they’ve always worked, so why change now?

These so-called “green” solutions are just another excuse to raise taxes and kill jobs. Ever notice how these climate fanatics want to shut down coal plants, but never talk about how many families depend on them for work? It's clear they care more about trees than people. This whole movement is driven by emotion, not logic.

And don’t get me started on electric cars. Lithium mining destroys the environment, but nobody wants to talk about that. Plus, most EVs still charge from coal-based electricity — so where’s the climate benefit? The only reason anyone buys one is to virtue signal on Instagram or get government handouts.

If the climate crisis were really that urgent, why aren’t the billionaires panicking? You think Bill Gates is giving up his private jet or beachfront mansion? They clearly know something we don’t. This whole thing feels like a hoax to make the rich richer while the rest of us pay the price.
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
By John Thompson on August 17, 2025

Analysis Summary

6
Truth Blocks
18.0
Avg Logic Quality
0.0
Avg User Score
0.0
Avg Evidence Score
Avg Total Score
0.43
Legacy Truth Score
0.82
Legacy Confidence
0.25
Legacy Weighted

Individual Truth Blocks

Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 9.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.65 Confidence: 0.85
🏃 Hasty_Generalization fallacy ⚠️ Oversimplification fallacy
I read about a blackout in Texas and someone said it was because wind turbines froze. So obviously renewables are unreliable and we can’t depend on them.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"I read about a blackout in Texas and someone said it was because wind turbines froze." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.65
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
Detected Fallacies:
Hasty_Generalization Oversimplification
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 17, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 0.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: 0.0
Truth: 0.25 Confidence: 0.75
⚖️ False_Dichotomy fallacy ⚠️ Oversimplification fallacy 👤 Ad_Hominem fallacy
These so-called “green” solutions are just another excuse to raise taxes and kill jobs.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"These so-called “green” solutions are just another excuse to raise taxes and kill jobs." Click to highlight above
View Comments (1) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.65
Truth: 0.25
Confidence: 0.75
Logic Quality: Moderate
Detected Fallacies:
False_Dichotomy Oversimplification Ad_Hominem
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Comment Stance Impact
Minimal Impact
Comments have neutral or balanced impact
Neutral
100.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.00
Comments have neutral impact (0.00)
Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 17, 2025
Block 3
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 0.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.25 Confidence: 0.75
⚖️ False_Dichotomy fallacy ⚠️ Oversimplification fallacy 🏃 Hasty_Generalization fallacy
Ever notice how these climate fanatics want to shut down coal plants, but never talk about how many families depend on them for work? It's clear they care more about trees than people.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Ever notice how these climate fanatics want to shut down coal plants, but never talk about how many families depend on them for work?" Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.65
Truth: 0.25
Confidence: 0.75
Logic Quality: Moderate
Detected Fallacies:
False_Dichotomy Oversimplification Hasty_Generalization
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 17, 2025
Block 4
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 22.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
⚖️ False_Dichotomy fallacy
This whole movement is driven by emotion, not logic.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"This whole movement is driven by emotion, not logic." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Moderate
Detected Fallacies:
False_Dichotomy
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 17, 2025
Block 5
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 77.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.80 Confidence: 0.85
Lithium mining destroys the environment, but nobody wants to talk about that. Plus, most EVs still charge from coal-based electricity — so where’s the climate benefit?
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Lithium mining destroys the environment, but nobody wants to talk about that." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.80
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 17, 2025
Block 6
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 0.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.30 Confidence: 0.85
🏃 Hasty_Generalization fallacy ⚖️ False_Dichotomy fallacy
The only reason anyone buys one is to virtue signal on Instagram or get government handouts.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"The only reason anyone buys one is to virtue signal on Instagram or get government handouts." Click to highlight above
View Comments (0) Dashboard
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.30
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
Detected Fallacies:
Hasty_Generalization False_Dichotomy
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Aug 17, 2025
About Truth Blocks

Truth blocks are minimal argument units that represent atomic reasoning. Each block is analyzed independently for:

  • Truth Score: Factual accuracy (0-1)
  • Reasoning Types: Deductive, inductive, etc.
  • Logical Fallacies: Detected reasoning errors
  • Confidence: AI certainty in analysis

The weighted score combines truth score with reasoning quality and fallacy penalties according to our scoring criteria.

Quick Actions
View Original JSON API All Analyses