Truth Blocks Analysis

Back to Post
New Scoring System: This post's overall score is calculated from the individual truth blocks below. To provide feedback or discuss specific arguments, comment on individual truth blocks rather than the post as a whole.
Manual Post - by Miles Navarro
by Miles Navarro • September 05, 2025
Original Post
Manual Post - by Miles Navarro
Just lost a brutal round of Catan. Thought I had the perfect strategy lined up—until someone slipped in with a sneaky settlement and flipped the whole board against me.

And it hit me: this is exactly how today’s “debates” play out.And it hit me: this is exactly how today’s “debates” play out. It’s not about who’s got the best plan or the clearest facts—it’s about who can twist the rules, shift the narrative, and distract long enough to grab control.

Maybe I’m just salty from losing, but watching misinformation flood into politics and tech regulation feels a lot like watching someone win Catan by bending the spirit of the game.Maybe I’m just salty from losing, but watching misinformation flood into politics and tech regulation feels a lot like watching someone win Catan by bending the spirit of the game. It’s not clever—it’s corrosive.
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
By Miles Navarro on September 05, 2025

Analysis Summary

4
Truth Blocks
56.8
Avg Logic Quality
Avg User Score
0.0
Avg Evidence Score
Avg Total Score
0.40
Legacy Truth Score
0.79
Legacy Confidence
0.52
Legacy Weighted

Individual Truth Blocks

Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 57.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.40 Confidence: 0.85
And it hit me: this is exactly how today’s “debates” play out. It’s not about who’s got the best plan or the clearest facts—it’s about who can twist the rules, shift the narrative, and distract long enough to grab control.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"And it hit me: this is exactly how today’s “debates” play out." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.40
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Sep 05, 2025
Block 1
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 57.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.40 Confidence: 0.85
And it hit me: this is exactly how today’s “debates” play out. It’s not about who’s got the best plan or the clearest facts—it’s about who can twist the rules, shift the narrative, and distract long enough to grab control.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"And it hit me: this is exactly how today’s “debates” play out." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.40
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Sep 05, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 57.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.40 Confidence: 0.85
Maybe I’m just salty from losing, but watching misinformation flood into politics and tech regulation feels a lot like watching someone win Catan by bending the spirit of the game.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Maybe I’m just salty from losing, but watching misinformation flood into politics and tech regulation feels a lot like watching someone win Catan by bending the spirit of the game." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.75
Truth: 0.40
Confidence: 0.85
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Sep 05, 2025
Block 2
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 56.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet
Truth: 0.40 Confidence: 0.60
Maybe I’m just salty from losing, but watching misinformation flood into politics and tech regulation feels a lot like watching someone win Catan by bending the spirit of the game.
Source Mapping: Exact_Quote
This is an exact quote from the original text.
Source sentence(s):
"Maybe I’m just salty from losing, but watching misinformation flood into politics and tech regulation feels a lot like watching someone win Catan by bending the spirit of the game." Click to highlight above
AI Analysis:
Reasoning: 0.73
Truth: 0.40
Confidence: 0.60
Logic Quality: Strong
AI Justification:

AI evaluation using unified criteria

Canonical Block | Criteria v2.0 | Updated: Sep 05, 2025
About Truth Blocks

Truth blocks are minimal argument units that represent atomic reasoning. Each block is analyzed independently for:

  • Truth Score: Factual accuracy (0-1)
  • Reasoning Types: Deductive, inductive, etc.
  • Logical Fallacies: Detected reasoning errors
  • Confidence: AI certainty in analysis

The weighted score combines truth score with reasoning quality and fallacy penalties according to our scoring criteria.