Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

20.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

20.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.30

Truth Accuracy

0.50

Detected Reasoning

Emotional 0.2
Appeals to feelings about women's treatment

Logical Fallacies 1

Ad_Hominem -0.2
Attacks the person based on perceived treatment of women instead of addressing policies or qualifications

Truth Block Content & Analysis

Coming Soon

Block Content

“With the way he’s overlooked women, he probably shouldn’t be our next president either.” 2.

Evidence Quality

Evidence evaluation is currently in development and will be available soon.

Content Statistics

Word Count 15
Character Count 92
Confidence 0.85
Block Index 2

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.30) + Truth (0.50) / 2
Fallacies: 1
= 20.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(20.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 10.0 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Updating analysis...