Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

0.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

0.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.30

Truth Accuracy

0.50

Detected Reasoning

Logical Fallacies 2

Ad_Hominem -0.2
Attacks the credibility of the World Resources Institute based on funding sources.
False_Premise -0.4
Assumes that the conclusions of the World Resources Institute are canards without evidence.

Truth Block Content & Analysis

Coming Soon

Block Content

Block 4 46 words 307 chars
The World Resources Institute (funded by governments and the usual array of philanthropy projects and Woke endowments) rolled out the canards – perilous temperature rise and climate disasters – and concluded: ‘A key question was how countries would address lagging ambition in their new climate commitments.

Evidence Quality

Evidence evaluation is currently in development and will be available soon.

Content Statistics

Word Count 46
Character Count 307
Confidence 0.85
Block Index 4

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.30) + Truth (0.50) / 2
Fallacies: 2
= 0.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(0.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 0.0 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Add Comment View All Blocks

Updating analysis...