Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

0.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

0.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.30

Truth Accuracy

0.50

Detected Reasoning

Causal 0.8
Implying a causal link between past accusations and current claims without evidence

Logical Fallacies 2

Bandwagon -0.15
Popularity of past accusations used to dismiss current claims
False_Premise -0.4
Assumes accusations against Trump are always false without evidence

Truth Block Content & Analysis

Coming Soon

Block Content

Block 8 41 words 227 chars
“Your confidence should be in the fact that for decades, lots of people have been trying to go after President Trump falsely, and when it came to the Epstein saga, it’s exactly the same story.” 🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy?

Evidence Quality

Evidence evaluation is currently in development and will be available soon.

Content Statistics

Word Count 41
Character Count 227
Confidence 0.85
Block Index 8

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.30) + Truth (0.50) / 2
Fallacies: 2
= 0.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(0.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 0.0 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Add Comment View All Blocks

Updating analysis...