Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

0.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

0.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.40

Truth Accuracy

0.50

Detected Reasoning

Logical Fallacies 2

Ad_Hominem -0.2
Attacks the paper's use of personal ideology instead of addressing the argument directly.
False_Premise -0.4
Assumes that personal ideology is inherently less valid than empirical evidence without justification.

Truth Block Content & Analysis

Coming Soon

Block Content

Block 3 37 words 235 chars
Mel Curth (TA): “I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs… but because the paper did not answer the questions, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence, and is at times offensive.” 3.

Evidence Quality

Evidence evaluation is currently in development and will be available soon.

Content Statistics

Word Count 37
Character Count 235
Confidence 0.85
Block Index 3

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.40) + Truth (0.50) / 2
Fallacies: 2
= 0.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(0.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 0.0 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Add Comment View All Blocks

Updating analysis...