Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

55.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

55.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.70

Truth Accuracy

0.40

Detected Reasoning

Deductive 0.9
Detected with 0.82 confidence (fallback)
Abductive 0.5
Detected with 0.58 confidence (fallback)
Analogical 0.6
Detected with 0.95 confidence (fallback)
Causal 0.8
Detected with 0.54 confidence (fallback)

Logical Fallacies 0

No logical fallacies detected

Truth Block Content & Analysis

Coming Soon

Block Content

"Prof Davison says that, with pressures like climate change and forest loss affecting their natural habitat in Cuba, 'you can easily imagine where people collecting shells would tip a population over into local extinction'."

Evidence Quality

Evidence evaluation is currently in development and will be available soon.

Content Statistics

Word Count 34
Character Count 224
Confidence 0.60
Block Index 4

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.70) + Truth (0.40) / 2
Fallacies: 0
= 55.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(55.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 27.5 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Updating analysis...