Single Truth Block View: You're viewing one truth block out of 6. Click here to see all truth blocks with highlighted text →
From: Post
The Scientific Evidence for Climate Change: What the Data Really Shows

I've spent the last decade researching climate science, and I need to share what the data actually shows. The evidence for human-caused climate change is overwhelming and comes from multiple …...

By Research Rachel on August 01, 2025

Atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 parts per million in pre-industrial times to over 420 ppm today.

AI Analysis
Reasoning Score: 0.75
Truth Score: 0.85
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Strong
Reasoning Types:
inductive causal
Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Comments (1)

Login to comment on this truth block.

Traditional Tom August 01, 2025 2:58 PM Disagree
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 0.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: 87.0


So what? CO2 is plant food! More CO2 means plants grow better. I learned that in high school biology. The Earth has had much higher CO2 levels in the past and life thrived.

And you're telling me that a tiny increase from 280 to 420 parts per million is going to destroy the planet? That's like saying adding one more grain of sand to a beach will make it collapse. It's ridiculous!

Besides, how do we even know what the CO2 levels were 200 years ago? They didn't have the technology to measure it back then. These "pre-industrial" numbers are just estimates and guesses. You can't trust them.

Poor Logic Quality Poor Evidence Oversimplification Fallacy False_Premise Fallacy False_Premise Fallacy
Detailed Score Analysis
AI Analysis Breakdown
Reasoning Quality: 0.75
Truth Accuracy: 0.70
Base Score: 0.73
Fallacy Penalties: -1.10

Final Logic Score: 0.0/100
Evidence Quality
Citations & Sources: 10.0/100
Weak evidence, lacks supporting sources
Logical Fallacies Detected (3)
These logical errors reduce the argument's strength and lower the overall score.
-0.3 penalty
Oversimplifies the impact of CO2 on the environment
Impact: This fallacy reduces logical reasoning quality Learn more →
-0.4 penalty
Assumes that because CO2 is beneficial for plants, increased levels are not harmful to the environment
Impact: This fallacy reduces logical reasoning quality Learn more →
-0.4 penalty
Dismisses the impact of increased CO2 levels based on historical data without considering other factors
Impact: This fallacy reduces logical reasoning quality Learn more →
Reasoning Patterns Identified
Inductive (0.7) Causal (0.8)
How to improve: Focus on clear reasoning, provide evidence for claims, and avoid logical fallacies. Learn more about logical reasoning
Dr. Emma August 01, 2025 2:58 PM Reply Agree
AI Analysis Logic: 87.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet


Tom, I appreciate your high school biology knowledge, but the relationship between CO2 and climate is more complex than "CO2 is plant food."

**On CO2 as plant food**: While CO2 does help plants grow, this is only true up to a point. Many plants actually grow less efficiently at very high CO2 levels, and the nutritional quality of crops decreases. More importantly, the warming effect of CO2 far outweighs any benefits to plant growth.

**On the 280 to 420 ppm increase**: This 50% increase may seem small, but it's actually massive in geological terms. The Earth's climate is very sensitive to CO2 changes. During the last ice age, CO2 levels were only about 180 ppm - a difference of just 100 ppm caused global temperatures to be 5-6°C colder than today.

**On historical CO2 levels**: We know pre-industrial CO2 levels from ice cores, which preserve ancient air bubbles. These measurements are extremely accurate and show that current CO2 levels are higher than they've been in at least 800,000 years. The rate of increase is also unprecedented - it's happening 100 times faster than natural changes.

**On the "grain of sand" analogy**: This is misleading. A better analogy would be: if you're driving a car and gradually turn the steering wheel, even a small turn can eventually cause a major change in direction. CO2 is like that steering wheel for Earth's climate.

The physics of the greenhouse effect is well-understood and has been known since the 1800s. CO2 traps heat in the atmosphere - this is basic physics, not speculation.

Sources: IPCC reports, ice core data from Vostok and EPICA, peer-reviewed studies on CO2 effects on plants.

Score Analysis
Reasoning: 0.85
Truth: 0.90

Final: 87.0/100
No fallacies detected
Evidence: 90.0/100
Strong sources
All Truth Blocks (6)
Block 1
The evidence for human-caused climate change is overwhelming …
77 23.0
Block 2
The last decade was the warmest on record, …
85 21.0
Block 3
Atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 parts per …
80 21.0
Current
Block 4
97% of climate scientists agree that human activities …
87 16.0
Block 5
We're seeing more frequent and intense heat waves, …
75 24.0
Block 6
The oceans are becoming more acidic as they …
80 21.0
About This Truth Block

This is a minimal argument unit extracted from the original content. It represents atomic reasoning that can be evaluated independently.

Block Index:
3
Logic Quality:
80.0/100
User Score:
21.0
Analyzed: