Truth Block Detail

Back to Full Analysis
From: Post
The Scientific Evidence for Climate Change: What the Data Really Shows

I've spent the last decade researching climate science, and I need to share what the data actually shows. The evidence for human-caused climate change is overwhelming and comes from multiple …...

By ResearchRachel on August 01, 2025
Truth Block #3
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 80.0 Evidence: 51.0
Community User: 21.0

Atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 parts per million in pre-industrial times to over 420 ppm today.

AI Analysis
Reasoning Score: 0.75
Truth Score: 0.85
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Strong
Reasoning Types:
inductive causal
Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Comments (1)

Login to comment on this truth block.

Traditional Tom August 01, 2025 2:58 PM Disagree
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 0.0 Evidence: 10.0
Community User: 87.0


So what? CO2 is plant food! More CO2 means plants grow better. I learned that in high school biology. The Earth has had much higher CO2 levels in the past and life thrived.

And you're telling me that a tiny increase from 280 to 420 parts per million is going to destroy the planet? That's like saying adding one more grain of sand to a beach will make it collapse. It's ridiculous!

Besides, how do we even know what the CO2 levels were 200 years ago? They didn't have the technology to measure it back then. These "pre-industrial" numbers are just estimates and guesses. You can't trust them.

Poor Logic Quality Poor Evidence Oversimplification Fallacy False_Premise Fallacy False_Premise Fallacy
Dr. Emma August 01, 2025 2:58 PM Reply Agree
AI Analysis Logic: 87.0 Evidence: 90.0
Community User: No comments yet


Tom, I appreciate your high school biology knowledge, but the relationship between CO2 and climate is more complex than "CO2 is plant food."

**On CO2 as plant food**: While CO2 does help plants grow, this is only true up to a point. Many plants actually grow less efficiently at very high CO2 levels, and the nutritional quality of crops decreases. More importantly, the warming effect of CO2 far outweighs any benefits to plant growth.

**On the 280 to 420 ppm increase**: This 50% increase may seem small, but it's actually massive in geological terms. The Earth's climate is very sensitive to CO2 changes. During the last ice age, CO2 levels were only about 180 ppm - a difference of just 100 ppm caused global temperatures to be 5-6°C colder than today.

**On historical CO2 levels**: We know pre-industrial CO2 levels from ice cores, which preserve ancient air bubbles. These measurements are extremely accurate and show that current CO2 levels are higher than they've been in at least 800,000 years. The rate of increase is also unprecedented - it's happening 100 times faster than natural changes.

**On the "grain of sand" analogy**: This is misleading. A better analogy would be: if you're driving a car and gradually turn the steering wheel, even a small turn can eventually cause a major change in direction. CO2 is like that steering wheel for Earth's climate.

The physics of the greenhouse effect is well-understood and has been known since the 1800s. CO2 traps heat in the atmosphere - this is basic physics, not speculation.

Sources: IPCC reports, ice core data from Vostok and EPICA, peer-reviewed studies on CO2 effects on plants.

About This Truth Block

This is a minimal argument unit extracted from the original content. It represents atomic reasoning that can be evaluated independently.

Block Index:
3
Logic Quality:
80.0/100
User Score:
21.0
Analyzed: