Single Truth Block View: You're viewing one truth block out of 6. Click here to see all truth blocks with highlighted text →
From: Post
The Scientific Evidence for Climate Change: What the Data Really Shows

I've spent the last decade researching climate science, and I need to share what the data actually shows. The evidence for human-caused climate change is overwhelming and comes from multiple …...

By Research Rachel on August 01, 2025

We're seeing more frequent and intense heat waves, hurricanes, and other extreme weather events.

AI Analysis
Reasoning Score: 0.75
Truth Score: 0.75
Confidence: 0.80
Logic Quality: Strong
Reasoning Types:
inductive causal
Comment Stance Impact
Low Impact
Comments generally support this truth block
Agree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: 0.17
Disagree
50.0%
1 comment
Impact: -0.02
Comments support this argument (0.15)
Comments (1)

Login to comment on this truth block.

Traditional Tom August 01, 2025 2:58 PM Disagree
AI Analysis Logic Quality: 12.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: 87.0


More hurricanes? That's just because we have better technology to detect them now! In the old days, hurricanes that happened out in the ocean never got recorded. Now we have satellites and radar that catch every single one.

And heat waves? I remember the summer of 1988 - that was way hotter than anything we've had recently. The media just hypes up every hot day now because it fits their climate change narrative.

Weather has always been extreme. The Dust Bowl in the 1930s was way worse than anything we're seeing today. This is just normal weather patterns, not some man-made crisis. You can't blame every bad weather event on climate change!

Poor Logic Quality Poor Evidence Hasty_Generalization Fallacy False_Dichotomy Fallacy
Detailed Score Analysis
AI Analysis Breakdown
Reasoning Quality: 0.75
Truth Accuracy: 0.70
Base Score: 0.73
Fallacy Penalties: -0.60

Final Logic Score: 12.0/100
Evidence Quality
Citations & Sources: 30.0/100
Weak evidence, lacks supporting sources
Logical Fallacies Detected (2)
These logical errors reduce the argument's strength and lower the overall score.
-0.3 penalty
Drawing broad conclusions from limited examples
Impact: This fallacy reduces logical reasoning quality Learn more →
-0.3 penalty
Presenting a false choice between natural weather patterns and man-made climate change
Impact: This fallacy reduces logical reasoning quality Learn more →
Reasoning Patterns Identified
Inductive (0.7) Causal (0.8)
How to improve: Focus on clear reasoning, provide evidence for claims, and avoid logical fallacies. Learn more about logical reasoning
Dr. Emma August 01, 2025 2:59 PM Reply Agree
AI Analysis Logic: 87.0 Evidence: Coming Soon
Community User: No comments yet


Tom, let me address your concerns about extreme weather and detection technology:

**On hurricane detection**: You're partially correct that detection technology has improved, but this doesn't explain the observed trends. Studies that account for detection improvements still find increases in hurricane intensity and rainfall. The warming ocean provides more energy for hurricanes, making them stronger when they do form.

**On your memory of 1988**: Personal memories are not reliable scientific data. The summer of 1988 was indeed hot, but it wasn't the hottest on record. The last decade has seen multiple years hotter than 1988. More importantly, we're seeing increases in both frequency and intensity of heat waves globally, not just in the US.

**On the Dust Bowl**: The Dust Bowl was indeed extreme, but it was primarily caused by poor farming practices and drought, not climate change. Today's extreme weather events are different - they're occurring against a background of global warming that makes them more likely and more intense.

**On blaming every weather event**: Scientists don't blame every weather event on climate change. Instead, they use attribution science to determine how much climate change increased the likelihood or intensity of specific events. For example, climate change made the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat wave 150 times more likely.

The key is that climate change doesn't cause weather events - it loads the dice, making extreme events more likely and more intense. This is well-documented in peer-reviewed literature.

Sources: IPCC reports on extreme weather, attribution studies, peer-reviewed research on hurricane trends.

Score Analysis
Reasoning: 0.85
Truth: 0.90

Final: 87.0/100
No fallacies detected
Evidence: 90.0/100
Strong sources
All Truth Blocks (6)
Block 1
The evidence for human-caused climate change is overwhelming …
77 23.0
Block 2
The last decade was the warmest on record, …
85 21.0
Block 3
Atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 parts per …
80 21.0
Block 4
97% of climate scientists agree that human activities …
87 16.0
Block 5
We're seeing more frequent and intense heat waves, …
75 24.0
Current
Block 6
The oceans are becoming more acidic as they …
80 21.0
About This Truth Block

This is a minimal argument unit extracted from the original content. It represents atomic reasoning that can be evaluated independently.

Block Index:
5
Logic Quality:
75.0/100
User Score:
24.0
Analyzed: