Tom, let me address your concerns about temperature records and data quality: **On the 150-year record**: You're right that instrumental records only go back about 150 years, but that's actually sufficient to detect the current warming trend. More importantly, we have proxy data (ice cores, tree rings, ocean sediments) that go back thousands of years, and they all show that current warming is unprecedented in at least the last 2,000 years. **On your cold winter in Ohio**: This is a classic confusion between weather and climate. Weather is what happens day-to-day; climate is the long-term average. A cold winter in one location doesn't disprove global warming any more than a hot day disproves global cooling. The key is the global average over decades. **On data manipulation**: The claim about temperature stations near parking lots is a myth. Temperature data is carefully quality-controlled, and stations near heat sources are either moved or their data is adjusted. Multiple independent teams (NASA, NOAA, Berkeley Earth, UK Met Office) have analyzed the data and found the same warming trend, even when using different methods and data sources. The warming trend is clear: the last 10 years have been the warmest on record, and 2023 was the hottest year ever recorded. This isn't just a few hot days - it's a consistent, long-term pattern that matches what climate models predicted decades ago. Sources: NASA GISS, NOAA NCEI, Berkeley Earth, peer-reviewed studies on temperature data quality.
Login to comment on this truth block.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This is a minimal argument unit extracted from the original content. It represents atomic reasoning that can be evaluated independently.