Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

75.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

75.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.75

Truth Accuracy

0.75

Detected Reasoning

Inductive 0.7
Draws from current political context
Causal 0.8
Posits a causal relationship between ban and politics

Logical Fallacies 0

No logical fallacies detected

Truth Block Content & Analysis

48.0/100

Block Content

Block 2 21 words 125 chars
Supporters of TikTok argue that the security risks are overblown and that the ban is more about politics than actual threats.

Evidence Quality

Weak Moderate Strong

Content Statistics

Word Count 21
Character Count 125
Confidence 0.80
Block Index 2

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.75) + Truth (0.75) / 2
Fallacies: 0
= 75.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(75.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 37.5 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Add Comment View All Blocks

Updating analysis...