Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

77.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

77.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.75

Truth Accuracy

0.80

Detected Reasoning

Deductive 0.7
Balanced approach based on multiple factors
Inductive 0.8
Draws from the importance of considering various aspects

Logical Fallacies 0

No logical fallacies detected

Truth Block Content & Analysis

60.0/100

Block Content

Block 5 25 words 177 chars
I believe in taking a balanced approach to addressing climate change that considers the scientific evidence alongside the economic and social implications of proposed solutions.

Evidence Quality

Weak Moderate Strong

Content Statistics

Word Count 25
Character Count 177
Confidence 0.85
Block Index 5

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.75) + Truth (0.80) / 2
Fallacies: 0
= 77.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(77.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 38.5 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Add Comment View All Blocks

Updating analysis...