Truth Block Scoring Analysis

Interactive breakdown of AI analysis and community feedback

25.0
AI Evaluation

Logic Quality Analysis

25.0/100

Reasoning Quality

0.40

Truth Accuracy

0.50

Detected Reasoning

Logical Fallacies 1

Slippery_Slope -0.2
Claims that removing the ban would inevitably lead to disaster and land grabbing without evidence of a direct causal link.

Truth Block Content & Analysis

Coming Soon

Block Content

Block 5 29 words 172 chars
Environmental groups have warned removing the ban would be "disaster", opening the way for a new wave of land grabbing to plant more soya in the world's largest rainforest.

Evidence Quality

Evidence evaluation is currently in development and will be available soon.

Content Statistics

Word Count 29
Character Count 172
Confidence 0.85
Block Index 5

Pattern Detection

Strong Evidence
Weak Evidence

Key Terms

Community Feedback

/100
0
Total Comments (incl. replies)

Stance Distribution

How the community responds to this truth block's claims

Agree: Supporting evidence
Disagree: Challenging evidence
Neutral: Additional context

Comment Quality

Recent Comments (All Levels)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your analysis!

Add Comment

Score Calculation Flow

AI Analysis (50%)

Reasoning (0.40) + Truth (0.50) / 2
Fallacies: 1
= 25.0/100
+

User Feedback (50%)

Stance Impact: 0.000
0 comments: 0 agree, 0 disagree, 0 neutral
= /100

Total Score

(AI × 0.5) + (User × 0.5)
(25.0 × 0.5) + ( × 0.5)
= 12.5 /100
Stance Impact Analysis
Total Comments: 0
Average Comment Quality: 0.0/100
Stance Impact Score: 0.000
● Agree: 0 (0.0%)
● Disagree: 0 (0.0%)
● Neutral: 0 (0.0%)

Take Action

Engage with this truth block or explore related content

Add Comment View All Blocks

Updating analysis...