The pictures appear to have been first shared by a Facebook page carrying US military news.

They show the E-3 Sentry aircraft appears to have been split in two.

We've confirmed the photos were taken at the Prince Sultan air base about 100km (62 miles) south-east of the Saudi capital Riyadh.

Features seen in the pictures, including pylons, storage units and markings on paved areas, matched with satellite imagery.

On Friday a US official told Reuters that 12 US personnel had been wounded, two of them seriously, in an Iranian military attack on the air base.

The Wall Street Journal newspaper reported that at least two US refuelling aircraft were also damaged.

BBC Verify has also seen an E-3 in this location in a satellite image captured on 11 March.

We cannot say if they are the same aircraft.

In one of the verified pictures the aircraft's tail number is visible.

Using this we checked flight-tracking site Flightradar24 which showed it was airborne near the base on 18 March.

A satellite image taken on Friday appears to show a fire on the air base apron, about 1,600m (5,200ft) east of the E-3.

It is not clear whether this was part of the same attack in which the aircraft seen in these pictures was damaged.

The Boeing E-3 Awacs - the acronym stands for Airborne Warning and Control System - is based on a Boeing 707 airliner and has a distinctive rotating radar disc mounted on the rear of its fuselage.

This radar allows it to detect and track potential targets at long ranges to provide an early warning of possible threats during combat operations.

The aircraft gives "information for commanders of air operations to gain and maintain control of the air battle", according to the USAF website

Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding claims. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Claim Quality:
✓ Healthy Claim - No fallacies or contradictions detected
⚠️ Minor Issues - Has contradictions or minor fallacies
🚨 Serious Issues - Multiple contradictions or severe fallacies
Quality Criteria: Claims are evaluated for logical fallacies and contradictions with other news sources. Green highlights indicate healthy claims suitable for reference.
Source