After reports of strong streaming numbers for a new HBO Max series, some claims started circulating:
1. “This show is officially the new Friends.”
2. “If millions are streaming it, the audience has spoken.”
3. “Friends wouldn’t survive in today’s streaming era anyway.”
4. “High rewatch numbers prove it has the same cultural impact.”
5. “Streaming success means the writing clearly connects more with modern audiences.”
6. “Nostalgia is the only reason people still defend older sitcoms.”
🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy? Which thinking traps can you spot here?
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
Source