👇 Here are some direct and notable reactions from conservative figures after part of the Epstein files were released:

1. “The heavily redacted Epstein files are a betrayal of the MAGA movement.” — Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene
2. “This is politically motivated and insufficient transparency.” — Representative Thomas Massie
3. “[Conservatives] praised exposure of figures like Bill Clinton in unredacted photos.” — conservative commentary (mixed response)
4. “The release is not the full truth, and too much was obscured.” — Right-wing critics of the DOJ redactions
🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy? Which thinking traps can you spot in these statements?
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
Source