👇 Here are some viral claims that have been circulating about Jake Paul and Anthony Joshua — but note these are claims online, not verified statements from either boxer:
1. “Jake Paul is suing Anthony Joshua for breaking his jaw.”
2. “Paul is seeking compensation for his injury after the fight.”
3. “There’s a lawsuit filed in court accusing Joshua of intentional harm.”
4. “Paul will take legal action against Joshua for medical bills.”
5. “The injury has sparked a major lawsuit that could change boxing contracts.”

🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy? Which thinking traps can you spot in these viral claims?
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
Source