Found 226 content items matching your criteria.
This argument contains several logical fallacies. First, it assumes causation from correlation (post hoc fallacy) - the fact that illness followed 5G installation doesn't prove it was caused by it. Second, it relies on anecdotal evidence rather than peer-reviewed research. According to the WHO and multiple independent studies (Smith et …
SourceIt's obvious that 5G towers are causing health problems. Ever since they started putting them up in my neighborhood, more people have been getting sick. My friend's cousin got cancer just two months after a tower was installed near her house. And doctors won't admit it because they're in the …
This argument commits a **hasty generalisation**: you extrapolate from a handful of neighbours to the whole grid. Life-cycle analyses (e.g. *Nature* 2024) show EVs emit less CO₂ than diesel in 93 % of regions, even when grid mix includes coal. You also ignore that diesel production/refining has its own emissions.
SourceEveryone knows electric cars run on coal-powered electricity. Since coal is dirtier than diesel, it's obvious EVs are worse for the planet. All my neighbours who bought EVs still get power from a coal plant, and air quality hasn't improved, so EVs clearly make no difference.
Interesting question. I believe we're still in the early stages, primarily focused on R&D. True practical applications at scale are likely a decade away, but the foundational work is essential.
Quantum computers promise to revolutionize fields like medicine and materials science, but how far are we from seeing tangible, widespread applications? Are current investments justified?