This argument contains several logical fallacies. First, it assumes causation from correlation (post hoc fallacy) - the fact that illness followed 5G installation doesn't prove it was caused by it. Second, it relies on anecdotal evidence rather than peer-reviewed research. According to the WHO and multiple independent studies (Smith et al., 2021), 5G radiation is non-ionizing and doesn't have the energy to damage cells or DNA. I'd recommend reviewing these studies rather than relying on coincidental patterns.
Source
No Analysis Yet
This content hasn't been analyzed into truth blocks yet. Click here to analyze and see detailed truth blocks
This content hasn't been analyzed into truth blocks yet. Click here to analyze and see detailed truth blocks
Logic Quality Breakdown:
- Raw_Score: 65.0
-
Factual Score: 30.0
Analysis: Partially supported claims
- Ai_Analysis:
- Final_Score: 65.0
- Analysis_Method:
- Fallacy_Penalty: 0.0
-
Reasoning Score: 35.0
Analysis: Moderate reasoning
Of course a so-called "professor" would defend the establishment! You're probably funded by the same corporations. If 5G is so safe, why have some countries banned it? And why do these companies spend millions lobbying against safety studies? Check your facts before blindly believing government propaganda.
Logic Quality Breakdown: