What nearly went wrong on Nasa's space mission - and what still could
In the tense final hours before Nasa's astronauts flew into space, a series of technical issues threatened to ground their landmark mission.
A faulty toilet and issues involving two safety systems were reported over the radio.
Nasa managed to resolve the problems by being "quick on their feet", an official later said.
Here's what nearly went wrong - and what still could. 'Toilet is go' The crew quickly discovered that even a trip to the Moon comes with very down‑to‑earth plumbing problems.
Astronaut Christina Koch reportedly acted as a plumber, dismantling parts of the toilet under instruction from mission control.
"Happy to report that toilet is go for use," mission control later said over the radio.
"We do recommend letting the system get to operating speed before donating fluid".
The lack of gravity in space means waste management is a key issue in space travel.
Nasa has spent more than $23m (£17.
4m) developing the "Universal Waste Management System".
A specialised seat allows for stools to be sucked into a sealed container, with tethers and restraints being used to stop the crew from floating away. The Orion - the spacecraft on which they're travelling - also has plenty of backup options, from alternative collection bags to different ways of routing liquids.
The flight termination system allows engineers on the ground to destroy the rocket if it veers off course.
We then heard the staccato rhythm of the calls by each engineer responsible for the rocket's critical systems. One by one the voices came back: "Booster, go", "GNC, go", "Range, go" - each reply, a tiny release of tension and a build-up of expectation.
"Artemis II, this is Launch Director – you are go for launch," the crew was told.
"We go for all humanity," Commander Reid Wiseman responded. The rocket then launched into the sky, to the awe of those watching at the Kennedy Space Centre and around the world. Trying to break spacecraft Now safely in the Earth's orbit, the crew have been directed to spend hours quietly trying to break their spacecraft - on purpose. They cycle computers through different modes, switch radios between ground stations and relay satellites, and deliberately move around the cabin to see how the life‑support system copes as carbon dioxide and humidity build up. Additional reporting by Esme Stallard and Tom Bennett
Logic Quality Breakdown:
- Updated_At:
- Truth_Blocks:
- Analysis_Method: