Global oil prices have fallen sharply and stock markets have jumped after the US and Iran agreed to a conditional two-week ceasefire deal that includes the reopening of the key Strait of Hormuz waterway.

The price of benchmark Brent crude fell by about 13% to $94.

73) a barrel, while US-traded oil was more than 15% lower at $95.

But oil prices remain higher than before the conflict started on 28 February.

At the time, it was trading at around $70 a barrel.

The cost of energy has jumped as oil and gas supplies from the Middle East have been severely disrupted after Iran threatened to attack ships trying to use the strait in retaliation to US and Israeli airstrikes.

Japan's Nikkei 225 gained by 5% while South Korea's Kospi jumped by nearly 6%.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng was up by 2.

8%, while the ASX 200 in Australia gained 2.

Futures contracts are an agreement to buy an asset for a set price at a later point in time.

In the case of US stock stock futures they can indicate the direction of the market before it opens.

In a social media post on Tuesday evening, Trump said: "I agree to suspend the bombing and attack of Iran for a period of two weeks.

subject to the Islamic Republic of Iran agreeing to the COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz".

He had set a deadline for 20:00 EDT on Tuesday (00:00 GMT on Wednesday), threatening that "a whole civilisation will die tonight" if no deal was reached.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on social media that Tehran will agree to a ceasefire "if attacks against Iran are halted", adding that safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz "will be possible".

Despite his threats, Trump was likely to be wary about letting energy prices "skyrocket" by escalating the conflict, said Xavier Smith from market research firm AlphaSense.

That could have led to a "self-inflicted economic wound" that few would risk, especially given the looming pressure of approval ratings on Trump's leadership, said Smith, a research director.

More oil tankers stranded near the strait may be able to pass through the waterway during the ceasefire, providing some relief for markets in the coming weeks, said analyst Saul Kavonic from financial services firm MST Marquee.

Despite the conflict, some ships have passed through the Strait of Hormuz, although far fewer than usual.

China has also acknowledged that several of its ships have crossed the strait since the war began.

Meanwhile, a Malta-flagged container vessel owned by French company CMA CGM crossed the shipping route, media organisation BFM TV - which is owned by the shipping firm - confirmed on Friday.

And a Japanese ship carrying natural gas also made it out of the strait, shipping giant MOL confirmed.

Kavonic said that while a ceasefire is in place, it is still unlikely that energy production in the Middle East will fully resume until there is confidence of a lasting peace deal.

It could also take months for production to restart due to damage done to energy infrastructure in the region, he said.

It could take years to fix the damage and cost more than $25bn, according to research firm Rystad Energy.

Energy prices jumped in mid-March after strikes on Qatar's Ras Laffan industrial hub, which produces about a fifth of the world's liquefied natural gas.

The hub's owners said the attacks have reduced the country's export capacity by 17% and that it will take up to five years to repair the damage.

Asia has been hit particularly hard by the economic fallout of the Iran war as many countries are heavily reliant on energy from the Gulf.

"The ceasefire is good news for Asian countries.

If it holds, oil prices will return to normal states, though this will take time

Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding claims. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Claim Quality:
✓ Healthy Claim - No fallacies or contradictions detected
⚠️ Minor Issues - Has contradictions or minor fallacies
🚨 Serious Issues - Multiple contradictions or severe fallacies
Quality Criteria: Claims are evaluated for logical fallacies and contradictions with other news sources. Green highlights indicate healthy claims suitable for reference.
Source