Here are some statements from President Trump on AI regulations:
1. “We want to have one central source of approval — 50 different regulatory regimes hamper the growth of the nascent industry.”
2. “To win, U.S. AI companies must be free to innovate without cumbersome regulation.” . “To win, U.S. AI companies must be free to innovate without cumbersome regulation.”
3. “Current patchwork regulations make compliance harder, especially for start-ups.”
4. “Until a national standard is in place, we will check the most onerous and excessive state laws that threaten innovation.”
5. “States that conflict with federal AI priorities may lose access to federal broadband funding.”
6. “We must act to prevent ideological bias and false results in AI.”
Your turn: Where’s the fallacy? Which thinking traps can you spot in these statements?

Context Notes for Audience:
Critics argue this could create a “lawless Wild West” for AI, weakening safety and consumer protections.
Some points may involve false dilemmas (innovation vs. regulation), appeal to consequences, or oversimotections.
Some points may involve false dilemmas (innovation vs. regulation), appeal to consequences, or oversimplification.
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
Source