Here are some statements from Revanth Reddy about the central government:
1. “The BJP government systematically disenfranchises citizens through its policies.”
2. “Decisions are made to suppress opposition and marginalize large sections of the population.”
3. “The current administration does not care about the common man; it only focuses on its own agenda.”
4. “Every step the government takes seems aimed at weakening democratic rights and civil liberties.”
5. “The central leadership is ignoring the needs of states that oppose it politically.”
🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy? Which thinking traps can you spot in these statements?

Context Notes for Audience:
Critics might point out generalizations (“every step” / “systematically”), appeal to fear, or ad hominem against the government.
Supporters may argue it’s political rhetoric, highlighting the difference between fact-based critique and persuasive language.
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
Source