Here are some statements from Susie Wiles, White House Chief of Staff, in her recent interview:
1. “He [Trump] has an alcoholic’s personality, even though he doesn’t drink.”
2. “There’s nothing he can’t do — nothing, zero, nothing.”
3. “Some of the prosecutions might look like retribution.”
4. “On foreign pressure like Venezuela: We’re very sure we know who we’re blowing up.”
5. “There was a loose agreement that score settling would end early, but it hasn’t.”
Other allies are conspiracy theorists or zealots, depending on her view.
🤔 Your turn: Where’s the fallacy? Which thinking traps can you spot in these statements?
Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding truth blocks. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Content Type & Quality:
Strong Reasoning - Clear logic & evidence
Moderate - Some structure, could improve
Weak Reasoning - Fallacies or poor logic
ℹ️ Not Evaluable - Questions, personal statements (not poor quality)
Note: Gray highlights with dashed borders (ℹ️) indicate content like questions or personal experiences that aren't meant to present logical arguments. Low scores on these don't mean poor quality!
Source