Morgan McSweeney has said he does not recognise descriptions in the media about his behaviour while serving as Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff.

Speaking at security conference in Ukraine, McSweeney said he found it "strange reading about a character with the same name as mine sometimes", as he spoke publicly for the first time about his departure from No 10 over Lord Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador.

He expressed regret over his decision to advise Sir Keir to appoint Lord Mandelson, but declined to discuss the issue in detail ahead of giving evidence to MPs on the Foreign Affairs Committee next week.

McSweeney is likely to be asked by the committee about whether he put pressure on civil servants to speed up Lord Mandelson's vetting.

In his resignation statement in February, McSweeney said he did not oversee the vetting but wanted to take "full responsibility" for advising the prime minister to appoint the peer.

Former senior Foreign Office civil servant Sir Olly Robbins this week accused No 10 of a "dismissive" attitude towards the process, a claim Downing Street has denied.

Lord Mandelson was sacked by Sir Keir in September last year after new information came to light about the depth of his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

McSweeney, appearing at the Kyiv Security Forum on Thursday, was asked about reports on his behaviour and whether he pressured civil servants into approving Lord Mandelson's vetting.

"I'm not going to say too much right now, I'm seeing the MPs next week and I don't want to in any way disrespect their process.

"But I find it strange reading about a character with the same name as mine sometimes, but yeah I don't recognise that character. "

McSweeney's name was also often linked with the perception that No 10 was a "boys' club" often ignoring Labour MPs.

He helped mastermind Sir Keir's rise to the top of the party, and then to Downing Street. Asked further about Lord Mandelson's appointment, McSweeney said he had taken responsibility for the advice he gave and resigned

Highlighted sentences link to their corresponding claims. Click any highlighted sentence to jump to its detailed analysis.
Highlight Colors Indicate Claim Quality:
✓ Healthy Claim - No fallacies or contradictions detected
⚠️ Minor Issues - Has contradictions or minor fallacies
🚨 Serious Issues - Multiple contradictions or severe fallacies
Quality Criteria: Claims are evaluated for logical fallacies and contradictions with other news sources. Green highlights indicate healthy claims suitable for reference.
Source